4 ms·
OK I probably am putting on blinders and mixing some words up.. But the problem with CCS is a lot of these stats count BS unnetworked, poorly maintained, singl
by steveBK123 4y ago
OK I probably am putting on blinders and mixing some words up..
But the problem with CCS is a lot of these stats count BS unnetworked, poorly maintained, single-stalls 50kW stations sitting in car dealer parking lots only usable 9a-5p, and stuff like that.
Checking the ones on the map near me, and it includes a bunch of CCS stations I've never seen actually working, stuff in government parking lots not available to public, and lots and lots of dealer special chargers which are of limited access..
If you were able to filter on "150kW+ L3 charging" the 6k number would probably drop to 2-3k maybe best case. Which would result in something like 2.5k stations x 4 stalls => 10k CCS stalls, vs 1.8k Tesla stations x 12 stalls = 22k stalls.
- vel0city 4y agoIsn't 2.5-3.0 still a larger number than 1.8? I'm definitely not arguing CCS has more stalls, as I do agree most CCS deployments are like 2-4 stalls while the average Tesla one is like 8 and its somewhat common to find stations with 10+. In the end, you said there are more "stations", and made a clear delineation of "stations" vs "stalls". This is incorrect, there are more CCS stations than Tesla. There are probably way more Tesla stalls, I'm pretty sure.