>It's straight up lying and clearly defaming ARS by claiming they "have a history of spreading misinformation". Its overall assessment of ARS may not be comple

>It's straight up lying and clearly defaming ARS by claiming they "have a history of spreading misinformation". Its overall assessment of ARS may not be completely false. For example, many knowledgable old users were banned for raising concerns about covid vaccine safety in the comment sections of articles with strong pro-covax slants. Those concerns are now considered valid by the mainstream and even ARS itself years later.