I'd strongly disagree with the idea that ChatGPT is essentially as trustworthy as humans and human-generated content because humans occasionally bullshit and mi

I'd strongly disagree with the idea that ChatGPT is essentially as trustworthy as humans and human-generated content because humans occasionally bullshit and misrepresent reality. You can rationalize what people are saying based on their experiences, opinions, and backgrounds. You can engage in the Socratic method with people, to unpack where their claims come from and get to the grounding "truth" of primary experience. You can't do any of these things with ChatGPT, because ChatGPT isn't grounded – it goes in circles at a level of abstraction where truth doesn't exist.