4 ms·
Nonsense. JavaScript bytecode would still be dynamically typed. At best a JavaScript bytecode standard would be equivalent to a compressed AST. That still might
by ootachi 15y ago
Nonsense. JavaScript bytecode would still be dynamically typed. At best a JavaScript bytecode standard would be equivalent to a compressed AST. That still might be a useful thing to have, but it wouldn't improve runtime performance.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]