3 ms·
This is my understanding as well. The amount of mystical projection by users and journalists when talking about it has been astounding. I guess the same could b
by MonkeyMalarky 4y ago
This is my understanding as well. The amount of mystical projection by users and journalists when talking about it has been astounding. I guess the same could be said of Bard and that one googler who lost their mind and got fired.
I guess we'll have to teach future children to "not project real emotions on to the simula" alongside "just because you read it on the internet doesn't mean it's true".
- simonh 4y agoWell, I'm thinking I must be missing some nuance, it seems like there must be some session state stored in the LLM somehow, otherwise it would have to re-parse the entire chat session from scratch to generate each succeeding token. But maybe it does do that. I'm trying to understand if it is learning, or building a model of the world in any persistent way how that is happening and where it exists, if at all.
- hrunt 4y ago"Please don't anthropomorphize the AI. It doesn't like that."
- MonkeyMalarky 4y agoGiven how delusional people can be, I expect we'll have billboards from People for the Ethical Treatment of Artificial Intelligences (PETAi) with messages like "You wouldn't `systemctl halt` a human child..." by the year 2035.
- bheadmaster 4y agoIt's funny that you call them delusional, when we both know that the problem of AI consciousness is unsolved (and might even be unsolvable). I, for one, would most likely become a member of PETAi as soon as I was convinced, without reasonable doubt, that AI had true consciousness like me. I don't see any fundamental reason why matrix multiplication couldn't serve as a vessel to consciousness, but a bunch of chemical reactions in neurons could.