4 ms·
Sure the criticism about Privacy Sandbox is valid. News journalists should dog food Firefox (to encourage end users) and then avoid Chrome. (i.e) they make sur
by throwaway2056 4y ago
Sure the criticism about Privacy Sandbox is valid.
News journalists should dog food Firefox (to encourage end users) and then avoid Chrome. (i.e) they make sure the webpages work great with Firefox. Usually everything works better with Chrome. The reason for the give would be sorry... Our livelihood depends on tracking/ads etc. Oh BTW, I (as a journalist ) am all for privacy but my corporate overlord (CondeNast incase of Ars) forces us to do this/that.
It is the same thing w.r.t. Firefox.
- cma 4y agoI've never had problems on the Ars site using Firefox.
- seanhunter 4y agoFirstly, journalists are not for the most part going to be the people designing the webpages. They will submit copy to some kind of CMS. So if a site isn't working well on Firefox/mobile/whatever it's generally not going to be the journo who is to blame it will be their designers probably. The exception to this would be small one-person type outfits but those are mostly on substack these days rather than running their own site. Secondly Ars Technica works completely fine for me on Firefox. I say that as someone who exclusively uses firefox and only ever breaks out chrome to debug compatibility issues and I can't recall ever having a problem with Ars Technica. Are you saying it doesn't work for you?