4 ms·
A lot better than the asses at Fox. Just look at the malice dripping from this fox article: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/01/18/wikipedia-goes-dark-for-24
by meow 15y ago
A lot better than the asses at Fox. Just look at the malice dripping from this fox article:
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/01/18/wikipedia-goes-dark-for-24-hours-to-protest-us-web-piracy-bills/ http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/01/18/wikipedia-goes-dar...
- toddmorey 15y agoThe worst part of the article is actually a quote form a Wikipedia editor. It's dismissive and inaccurate, but you always know that when you see the phrase "before we know it..": "My main concern is that it puts the organization in the role of advocacy, and that's a slippery slope," said editor Robert Lawton, a Michigan computer consultant who would prefer that the encyclopedia stick to being a neutral repository of knowledge. "Before we know it, we're blacked out because we want to save the whales."
- bad_user 15y agoI don't get people with this line of thought. This is about survival, not about fighting worthy causes, even though saving whales is a noble cause and I wouldn't mind if Wikipedia fought for it.