So the reasoning seems to be: 1) We can create such tools 2) Then we must create such tools 3) They can be used to harm others 4) Then we must change the rest o

So the reasoning seems to be: 1) We can create such tools 2) Then we must create such tools 3) They can be used to harm others 4) Then we must change the rest of society and the laws to adapt to them, alter publicly available images and impose restrictions on (preexisting) non-harmful actions Beyond bizarre.