> for the benefit of the device, not for your own benefit. I'm sure someone else has already brought this up, but I feel remit to point out that the benefit to

> for the benefit of the device, not for your own benefit. I'm sure someone else has already brought this up, but I feel remit to point out that the benefit to not damaging very expensive items is that the items were not expensive to themselves, but to the owner. There is a risk and cost analysis, in which adding a case is almost always worth it unless you are an edge case user like yourself. What benefits the device benefits the owner, with 1:1 parity in the metric.