4 ms·
Interesting. In my experience I found Metabase gets clunkier when you've to query for adhoc logs. However it's a great fit when it's just a template and all the
by mr-karan 4y ago
Interesting. In my experience I found Metabase gets clunkier when you've to query for adhoc logs. However it's a great fit when it's just a template and all the end user has to do is to enter some variables to see the logs.
I think LogQL + Grafana UI is a pretty rich/interactive experience of viewing logs v/s Metabase.
- mekster 4y agoI'd take regular tabular view for logs like this, https://www.metabase.com/glossary/images/table/example-table.png https://www.metabase.com/glossary/images/table/example-table... than this brain crushing string spaghetti view any day. https://grafana.com/static/img/docs/v64/logs-panel.png https://grafana.com/static/img/docs/v64/logs-panel.png I can easily colorize lines depending on log severity, filter by dates with a drop-down date selector UI, filter by each column value etc all in eye friendly manner. https://pasteboard.co/PQDjUwtFgZTW.png https://pasteboard.co/PQDjUwtFgZTW.png https://pasteboard.co/tfHHA1mgETvL.png https://pasteboard.co/tfHHA1mgETvL.png