Sure, and I’m not trying to put words in the author’s mouth here. I wanted to give some ‘historical’ context for those who may not have been around back then.

Sure, and I’m not trying to put words in the author’s mouth here. I wanted to give some ‘historical’ context for those who may not have been around back then. But I think it’s either a sincere mistake or a very poor attitude to bring up consent affecting the colour in relation to CSAM, which they explicitly do about a third of the way into the article.