It was a more specific point that the court used in their decision: that of compelled speech. > The Court emphasized that "[b]y compelling individuals to speak

It was a more specific point that the court used in their decision: that of compelled speech. > The Court emphasized that "[b]y compelling individuals to speak a particular message, such notices 'alte[r] the content of [their] speech.'" The “notices” refer to their hate speech mitigation policies. Read the full decision that the article summarized