2 ms·
> This isn't a mystery chemical; we've been working with the stuff since 1835, we've spilled it into the environment numerous times It has never been burned at
by yunwal 4y ago
> This isn't a mystery chemical; we've been working with the stuff since 1835, we've spilled it into the environment numerous times
It has never been burned at anywhere near this quantity. There are other chemicals that can react with it. Your strawmanning isn't winning you any points here.
> What is your goal...
I would like for these coverups to lose their effectiveness. I'd like for executives that gamble with human lives and the environment to be held responsible. I would like politicians and media organizations that repeatedly enable them to lose credibility. I would like the concerns of railroad workers to be taken seriously. I'd like for journalists to not be wrongfully arrested for doing their jobs. I'd like for the safety precautions for carrying hazardous materials to be enforced. I'd like to have institutions that I can more or less trust to tell me the truth.
- shadowgovt 4y agoThen I'm sorry because this isn't the disaster you're hoping for. But take heart, people continue to use technology so another disaster will certainly come along. > It has never been burned at anywhere near this quantity I'm curious your source for that assertion. https://www.csb.gov/formosa-plastics-vinyl-chloride-explosion/ https://www.csb.gov/formosa-plastics-vinyl-chloride-explosio...