4 ms·
It is possible that the resources were allocated towards initiatives that the decision-makers believed to be valuable and aligned with their own goals. Permit m
by pc_edwin 4y ago
It is possible that the resources were allocated towards initiatives that the decision-makers believed to be valuable and aligned with their own goals. Permit me to offer a few examples in a respectful manner:
1. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex
2. Michelle Obama
3. Kim Kardashian
4. Brené Brown
With all due respect, it appears that these particular selections exhibit a marked bias and detachment from the preferences of the average podcast listener.
Such choices may be seen as lacking a true appreciation and understanding of the diverse range of tastes and interests within the broader podcast community.
- threeseed 4y agoThere is no average podcast listener. And if they were then based on Apple Charts they would be apolitical and not interested in your diverse range of tastes and interests. Which I assume means not left-wing based on the not so subtle examples you listed.
- nomel 4y ago> There is no average podcast listener. Yet, there are definitely outliers!
- pc_edwin 4y agoIt is worth noting that, with the exception of Joe Rogan, the examples I have enumerated are among the most significant podcast investments made by Spotify. Speaking of subtlety, it bears repeating that the decision-making process of the team appears to be subject to a considerable degree of bias that is not particularly subtle. Source: https://www.quillpodcasting.com/blog-posts/spotify-podcasts https://www.quillpodcasting.com/blog-posts/spotify-podcasts