I don't accept the Turing Test is relevant for anything other than judging the Turing Test. I also don't accept it is remotely likely any intelligence indistin

I don't accept the Turing Test is relevant for anything other than judging the Turing Test. I also don't accept it is remotely likely any intelligence indistinguishable from humans in quality will lack sentience and consciousness. That's the whole point in calling out current AI paths of research, they don't address that, they just move closer and closer to your Turing Test, which doesn't interest me. Anyway, as we seem to be talking past each other, I'll agree to differ on whether AGI that matches human level capabilities in all aspects can exist without sentience and whatever else we are differing on.