show me Reason that is not axiomatically embedded in language. for anything else, how can you possibly know it's not operating on a (massively) complex statist

show me Reason that is not axiomatically embedded in language. for anything else, how can you possibly know it's not operating on a (massively) complex statistical model? are you gonna ask it? if you do science on it to discover it's complexity, why is the computationally shorter method to achieve the same results any worse or less authentic? it's like saying the closed form solution of a summation isn't "really" a summation either finally, you are letting the word "semantically" do a lot of work for you.