3 ms·
I’m not sure that sufficiently explains an apparent ability to do three dimensional reasoning when performing statistical inference in two dimensions?
by simondotau 4y ago
I’m not sure that sufficiently explains an apparent ability to do three dimensional reasoning when performing statistical inference in two dimensions?
- nerdponx 4y agoApparently millions of shadows and billions of parameters is enough. Does it always get them right, or just most of the time?
- majormajor 4y agoI've definitely seen it get reflections/lighting/shadows wrong. In exactly that sort of "this is an unusual perspective and it can't actually do the math" way.