2 ms·
> You could use records[1], or anonymous types[2]. Not quite with directness of JS. > There's delegates[3] and lambda expressions[4]. Again you can get somet
by prmph 4y ago
> You could use records[1], or anonymous types[2].
Not quite with directness of JS.
> There's delegates[3] and lambda expressions[4].
Again you can get something equivalent, but not without some ceremony. It’s not as frictionless as with JS.
- delta_p_delta_x 4y ago> It’s not as frictionless as with JS. I'm not sure how much less friction you want than directly declaring lambdas, or LINQ, or any of the newer functional constructs. Like I said, if you want more functional, there's F#, which is a dialect of ML.
- kaba0 4y agoI think your problem is just structural vs nominal typing, in that you can’t get away from the former.