3 ms·
Haven’t yet used Ruff in any project, but it does look very promising. I’m personally waiting for them to reimplement most of Pylint’s checks. https://github.c
by Narushia 4y ago
Haven’t yet used Ruff in any project, but it does look very promising. I’m personally waiting for them to reimplement most of Pylint’s checks.
https://github.com/charliermarsh/ruff/issues/970 https://github.com/charliermarsh/ruff/issues/970
- avdempsey 4y agoI'm more or less waiting on the same thing, but wonder how many it will be able to pick up. The maintainer states somewhere that many of Pylint's remaining checks involve type-checking and inferring types for less than fully typed code. I've also seen him state somewhere that writing a type-checker is probably out of scope since these are massive projects in their own right. I've not seen any statement about the expected future coverage of Pylint. Perhaps running Ruff plus a type checker gives us close to what Pylint does today? Pylint is pretty comprehensive, and awesome for that, but I'd love to lint at the speed of Ruff.
- stavros 4y agoI switched to it, and it's amazing. It basically runs instantly. I basically prefer the speed to the checks now, but YMMV.