4 ms·
Nope. Strawman. We're talking about it being ONE of the factors. All of them are however linked to easily obtained dopamine hits on the brain and what happens t
by DrThunder 4y ago
Nope. Strawman. We're talking about it being ONE of the factors. All of them are however linked to easily obtained dopamine hits on the brain and what happens to a child that's exposed to that constantly (hint: it's pretty similar to drug addiction). There are plenty of studies linked directly to porn's effects on not fully developed brains.
You need to focus the conversation on underage kids as well. We're not discussing restrictions for adults. We as a society have obviously decided pedophilia is unacceptable because it's mentally damaging to kids who cannot yet conceive the implications of what they're doing, you ought to be able extrapolate from that and logically conclude unfettered underage porn access is also mentally damaging. This isn't some massive leap.
If you want to argue that a certain law is the best way control it, I can understand that. However, I cannot wrap my head around any argument that tries to say allowing kids to just view porn unrestricted is fine.
- SketchySeaBeast 4y ago> This isn't some massive leap. I mean, if you think that porn viewing is basically rape, you're making a pretty large leap here. I hope you attack children viewing violent content with the same fervor because I guess viewing an activity is the same as participating in it?