3 ms·
No way. Humans are much smarter than SD, are they saying for hundreds of years we did the (not hands) shadows wrong?
by visarga 4y ago
No way. Humans are much smarter than SD, are they saying for hundreds of years we did the (not hands) shadows wrong?
- watwut 4y agoArtists today are still getting them wrong. Art education puts emphasis on this stuff today, but people make mistakes.
- hobo_mark 4y agoIt still blows my mind that midjourney & co. can get decent illumination, shadows and even reflections. Just... how?!
- onlyrealcuzzo 4y agoWisdom of the crowd? It's just statistically inferring from previously seen images.
- simondotau 4y agoI’m not sure that sufficiently explains an apparent ability to do three dimensional reasoning when performing statistical inference in two dimensions?
- nerdponx 4y agoApparently millions of shadows and billions of parameters is enough. Does it always get them right, or just most of the time?
- majormajor 4y agoI've definitely seen it get reflections/lighting/shadows wrong. In exactly that sort of "this is an unusual perspective and it can't actually do the math" way.