3 ms·
It's not about the facts, it's about the framing and omissions. They frame it as a "pollution war" and even use the phrase "countries that hate each other" in t
by pphysch 4y ago
It's not about the facts, it's about the framing and omissions. They frame it as a "pollution war" and even use the phrase "countries that hate each other" in the lede. This is "FBI Statistics" level of hate-baiting. It's not journalism.
- rhaway84773 4y agoWhich part is false?
- pphysch 4y agoPlease read at least the first sentence of a comment before replying to it. Preferably all of it, though.
- mikymoothrowa 4y agoThe title, if it’s not clear to you already. It makes it sound like there’s a pollution warfare even though the article makes no justifications on how these countries are choking on each other’s pollution rather than their own. The article also talks about Nepal and Bhutan but the title has only Ind/Pak it’s hard not to associate a nefarious reason especially because it is the economist should have simply been “South Asia is choking in its pollution”
- BeetleB 4y agoWhich part of his comment claimed anything was false?