6 ms·

Yeah, I think carbon recycling can be pretty good. They've been doing it on submarines for a while. (edit: nevermind, I was confused about the submarine th

by px43 4y ago

~~Yeah, I think carbon recycling can be pretty good. They've been doing it on submarines for a while.~~ (edit: nevermind, I was confused about the submarine thing, the user "idlewords" below has a lot of good commentary about this) At any given moment, any human is about 18% carbon. Carbon is also pretty important in *carbo*hydrates. Any plants that we would grow would need a ton of carbon. It can be done, but any moon colony will basically always be dependent on getting extra carbon from Earth, so it can never be "self sufficient" in the way that Mars can eventually be. It is kind of funny that on Earth, we're obsessed with capturing and burying as much carbon as possible, when it's going to be an incredibly valuable resource on the moon, assuming that a bunch of people are gong to want to live there.

wonderwonder 4y ago
Seems like carbon capture and export to the moon is a business that is just short of a billionaire to implement it.
idlewords 4y ago
Submarines don't recycle carbon; they capture CO2 and vent it.
- rtkwe 4y ago
  Mostly because they don't need to retain it though, a sub doesn't need to reprocess the CO2 into C and O2 but the process can be done. The process is largely the same instead of ejecting it as a waste product continue to break it down into useful products like injecting it into a Sabatier process.
  - idlewords 4y ago
    The Sabatier reactor on the space station broke after processing about a thousand liters of water because deodorant and astronaut urine poisoned the catalyst beds. Everything is easy to do in theory. Recycling carbon in practice is very, very hard if you don't have plants to help you.
  - shagie 4y ago
    Hypothetically... after you have separated the carbon from the oxygen (discounting the human waste which has a significantly more amount of carbon)... what would you do with it as part of a recycling process in a submarine?
    - rtkwe 4y ago
      In current tech not much comes to mine. Maybe it could be reprocessed into dry graphite lubricant but there's not much need for raw carbon or principally carbon materials in a submarine. That's another reason it just gets tossed there's just not a real use for it. On a hypothetical extraplanetary colony though it's a pretty important material just to keep people alive.
    - idlewords 4y ago
      You can store it as methane and cook with it in the galley.
      - shagie 4y ago
        That's not exactly a closed loop recycling system. Additionally, flame is very restricted on a sub. You wouldn't be using any sort of methane to cook. https://qr.ae/prgBKF https://qr.ae/prgBKF https://qr.ae/prgBsh https://qr.ae/prgBsh https://www.answers.com/Q/What_fuel_does_a_submarine_use_for_cooking https://www.answers.com/Q/What_fuel_does_a_submarine_use_for...
        midoridensha 4y ago
        The idea of using a combustible gas to cook is archaic and really dumb. It's amazing that people are still cooking this way today in many places. We've had better technology for ages.
      - rtkwe 4y ago
        You don't want to be simply reintroducing it into the atmosphere again that would just increase the amount you need to scrub out of the air because now your cycle just reintroduces all the CO2 you remove back into the air along with the stuff the sailors are breathing out. Submarines as far as I can see have basically always used electric cook tops for that reason, at least since they were designed to stay submerged most of the time. UBoats probably didn't because electric power was so limited they probably just didn't cook hot food while submerged.
shagie 4y ago
Submarines restock food, some air supplies, and... deal with waste. Food https://youtu.be/bPJUVKizh90 https://youtu.be/bPJUVKizh90 Air https://youtu.be/g3Ud6mHdhlQ https://youtu.be/g3Ud6mHdhlQ (MEA and LIOH for CO2, electrolysis and "candles" for oxygen) Toilet https://youtu.be/SYFuA3xnkUE?t=985 https://youtu.be/SYFuA3xnkUE?t=985 Nothing is "recycled" as such - and certainly not any of the carbon (you're not eating the carbon captured from MEA or LIOH... or your waste).

~~Yeah, I think carbon recycling can be pretty good. They've been doing it on submarines for a while.~~ (edit: nevermind, I was confused about the submarine th

by px43 4y ago

wonderwonder 4y ago

Seems like carbon capture and export to the moon is a business that is just short of a billionaire to implement it.

idlewords 4y ago

Submarines don't recycle carbon; they capture CO2 and vent it.

rtkwe 4y ago
Mostly because they don't need to retain it though, a sub doesn't need to reprocess the CO2 into C and O2 but the process can be done. The process is largely the same instead of ejecting it as a waste product continue to break it down into useful products like injecting it into a Sabatier process.
- idlewords 4y ago
  The Sabatier reactor on the space station broke after processing about a thousand liters of water because deodorant and astronaut urine poisoned the catalyst beds. Everything is easy to do in theory. Recycling carbon in practice is very, very hard if you don't have plants to help you.
- shagie 4y ago
  Hypothetically... after you have separated the carbon from the oxygen (discounting the human waste which has a significantly more amount of carbon)... what would you do with it as part of a recycling process in a submarine?
  - rtkwe 4y ago
    In current tech not much comes to mine. Maybe it could be reprocessed into dry graphite lubricant but there's not much need for raw carbon or principally carbon materials in a submarine. That's another reason it just gets tossed there's just not a real use for it. On a hypothetical extraplanetary colony though it's a pretty important material just to keep people alive.
  - idlewords 4y ago
    You can store it as methane and cook with it in the galley.
    - shagie 4y ago
      That's not exactly a closed loop recycling system. Additionally, flame is very restricted on a sub. You wouldn't be using any sort of methane to cook. https://qr.ae/prgBKF https://qr.ae/prgBKF https://qr.ae/prgBsh https://qr.ae/prgBsh https://www.answers.com/Q/What_fuel_does_a_submarine_use_for_cooking https://www.answers.com/Q/What_fuel_does_a_submarine_use_for...
      - midoridensha 4y ago
        The idea of using a combustible gas to cook is archaic and really dumb. It's amazing that people are still cooking this way today in many places. We've had better technology for ages.
    - rtkwe 4y ago
      You don't want to be simply reintroducing it into the atmosphere again that would just increase the amount you need to scrub out of the air because now your cycle just reintroduces all the CO2 you remove back into the air along with the stuff the sailors are breathing out. Submarines as far as I can see have basically always used electric cook tops for that reason, at least since they were designed to stay submerged most of the time. UBoats probably didn't because electric power was so limited they probably just didn't cook hot food while submerged.

shagie 4y ago

Submarines restock food, some air supplies, and... deal with waste. Food https://youtu.be/bPJUVKizh90 https://youtu.be/bPJUVKizh90 Air https://youtu.be/g3Ud6mHdhlQ https://youtu.be/g3Ud6mHdhlQ (MEA and LIOH for CO2, electrolysis and "candles" for oxygen) Toilet https://youtu.be/SYFuA3xnkUE?t=985 https://youtu.be/SYFuA3xnkUE?t=985 Nothing is "recycled" as such - and certainly not any of the carbon (you're not eating the carbon captured from MEA or LIOH... or your waste).