3 ms·
Screw this article's narrative. Spotify's problem is its abhorrent UX/UI! And this sentence is just lame AF: >"Joe Rogan, whose rambling, hours-long podcasts
by samstave 4y ago
Screw this article's narrative.
Spotify's problem is its abhorrent UX/UI!
And this sentence is just lame AF:
>"Joe Rogan, whose rambling, hours-long podcasts had somewhat confoundingly become the biggest hit in podcasting"
Rogan has some of the best guests on his show, they are informative and entertaining.
Also, does the author of this post even know how to skip whole episodes if he doesnt like the guest, or does he know how to 'scrub' (FF or RW)
-
You dont listen to the Rogan podcast for Rogan (typically) you listen to it for the guests.
The other best Podcast is Lex Fridman. Although I have to listen to that sped up ~1.25 usually, because lex talks too slowly for my taste - and the other frustrating fact is that Lex oft forgets/omits some of the obvious questions one would have for a guest -- or he hasnt informed himself well enough with the subject matter, he doesnt know to ask what others would find obvious.
But yeah - spotify's UX is so bad, I still just use YT JRE clips to get what I need from Rogan's episodes.
- nervousvarun 4y agoHonestly this is just a microcosm of the internet these days..."it's not part of my political bubble so if it's popular it's confounding". Honestly "confoundingly" is probably fair compared to what you typically see...which is closer to "everyone who doesn't think the same as me is evil/wrong".