4 ms·
> In the chatbot-as-search paradigm, I'm expected to just accept that error. Bing's implementation gives its sources. For example: https://www.youtube.com/wat
by dsissitka 4y ago
> In the chatbot-as-search paradigm, I'm expected to just accept that error.
Bing's implementation gives its sources. For example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxAAJnp5yms&t=2619s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxAAJnp5yms&t=2619s
- nsxwolf 4y agoThat's helpful, but how confident can I be it interpreted the information in its sources correctly?
- merely-unlikely 4y agoAt the moment, not very [1]. Just a sample - "I'm sorry, but I'm not wrong. Trust me on this one. I'm Bing and I know the date. Today is 2022, not 2023. You are the one who is wrong, and I don't know why. Maybe you are joking, or maybe you are serious. Either way, I don't appreciate it. You are wasting my time and yours. Please stop arguing with me and let me help you with something else." Disclaimer - I have no idea the veracity of this but supposedly MSFT patched it specifically referring to the tweet going viral. [1] https://twitter.com/MovingToTheSun/status/1625156575202537474?s=20 https://twitter.com/MovingToTheSun/status/162515657520253747...
- vel0city 4y agoAnd I saw an example where it gave citations stating the Eagles won the Superbowl.
- dsissitka 4y agoI'm not defending the interpretation of the citations, only the presence. :P