4 ms·
> Usually that means something like getting a PIP and six weeks to improve performance. Is that such an unreasonable ask? Isn't this what parent took issue wit
by trieste92 4y ago
> Usually that means something like getting a PIP and six weeks to improve performance. Is that such an unreasonable ask?
Isn't this what parent took issue with? If you can't fire the underperformers, where's the incentive to get shit done?
- realslimjd 4y agoYou can fire them after six weeks, which in the grand scheme of things is not that long. I've been places where it takes longer to get requirements back from clients.
- krainboltgreene 4y ago> If you can't fire the underperformers, where's the incentive to get shit done? The assumption with you guys is always three parts: 1. That the company actors know what good performance is, therefor they can determine underperformance 2. That underperformance is meaningful in the context (taking care of a sick kid for a month is underperformance, but not meaningful when the kid is no longer sick) 3. That the company actors are being truthful about the reason When in reality I know that company actors rarely understand good performance or thus underperformance, they rarely consider meaningfulness, and rarely are they actually telling the truth about the reason.