5 ms·
Yes, I am in the UK. The number of charging points is not keeping up with the planned schedule and number of new EVs on the road. The issue of people who cannot
by mytailorisrich 4y ago
Yes, I am in the UK. The number of charging points is not keeping up with the planned schedule and number of new EVs on the road. The issue of people who cannot charge at home is not being tackled. Perhaps the most important issue: The grid is not being upgraded and electricity production is not keeping up (matter made even worse by the push to also get rid of gas boilers in homes).
EVs are also still unaffordable to most, which is perhaps a blessing considering the above: Buying an EV is the 'easy' part.
Edit:
Grid is at capacity. There are many articles on that online from growing problems to connect new electricity sources to even potential restrictions on new homes [1].
Electricity production is not increasing. I believe peak production was reached in 2005 and since then nuclear plants have been decommissioned and renewables have not filled the gap.
So solve both issues is a big task to say the least. And then there's still the lack of charging points.
[1] https://www.ft.com/content/519f701f-6a05-4cf4-bc46-22cf10c7c2c0 https://www.ft.com/content/519f701f-6a05-4cf4-bc46-22cf10c7c...
- ClumsyPilot 4y ago> The grid is not being upgraded and electricity production is not keeping up. Why do you believe this is the case? I cannot see any evidence of this probpem, in fact. Octopus energy for example is very happy about using Evs to help balance the grid and their 'virtual powerplant' Charging ooint, yes, they are an issue PS: this https://octopus.energy/press/octopus-energy-grows-uks-largest-virtual-power-plant/ https://octopus.energy/press/octopus-energy-grows-uks-larges...
- flangola7 4y agoWhat do you mean by using EVs to balance the grid? How is drawing more power from it balancing it?
- dashundchen 4y agoMany utilities are interested in using EVs as batteries for the grid. After all, typical EVs sold today have 60-100kWh batteries and are sitting parked the majority of the time. The idea is the utility would offer payment or incentive to use your battery and balance the grid. The idea has been for a while, and is starting to come to wider testing with the finalization of Vehicle to Grid standards for the CCS charging standard. Some other charging standards like Chademo already supported this usecase but aren't widely used in Europe or North America.
- TheLoafOfBread 4y agoOf course, that most logical thing which owners of an expensive BEV will do, is joining a program where they can cycle out their expensive battery and come to discharged car at the morning.
- dashundchen 4y agoI think it would depend on the implementation of the program, but if the incentive is right, people will join. Many utilities already offer voluntary curtailment programs and time-of-use incentives, and customers definitely respond. Modern batteries with modern battery management systems are more durable than you think. Most things I've read expect a typical EV battery to retain usable capacity past the lifespan of the car itself, not to mention EVs typically have "hidden" capacity buffers against degradation. I doubt any program would completely discharge a car, likely a program would involve a smart charger that would charge and discharge within a certain agreed upon window. Look at the current residential demand response programs for an example. Details vary, but a quick search will show you a range of different programs. Typically, utilities will announce incentive windows for peak periods ahead of time. Opt-in customers have thermostats that will respond to the peak program by reducing heat or cooling to an agreed upon temperature. The customer can override if they would like, but if they do they will lose the incentive. Customers get a lower bill, utilities can save a lot shaving peak loads and avoid capacity problems.
- TheLoafOfBread 4y agoAs an BEV owner, there is no way in hell I would let incompetent utility company purposefully damage my battery, because they were too greedy to build their own storage.
- ClumsyPilot 4y agoI was skeptical as well, but enough people have signed up that it works. Our personal opinion doesnt matter.
- mytailorisrich 4y agoThe way I interpret that link to Octopus' website is simply that they over an off peak tariff to charge your EV at the best times for them, probably whenever there is excess electricity available. It does not say anything about using the EVs as storage. The "virtual powerplant" seems to be just a PR gimmick, which Octopus is very good at. In amy case, that does not solve the issue of overall production or grid capacity.
- vlovich123 4y ago> In amy case, that does not solve the issue of overall production or grid capacity. Actually that could have done well (although I wouldn’t hold my breath + all sorts of logistics of reality can prevent the utility). If you have 100 MWh of car batteries charging during off peak, that’s extra capacity you can leverage during peak hours. I do agree that in practice that won’t work out for all sorts of reasons (the comms and standards for that aren’t defined afaik + what happens if enough cars disconnect that suddenly you don’t have enough capacity and brownouts begin to shed load)
- DrBazza 4y ago> The grid is not being upgraded and electricity production is not keeping up Agreed. We need, charitably, a 25% increase in electricity generation, and we're not getting that. We're getting "(shouts) more wind turbines!!!" and "(whispers) we've just turned off a 250MW gas power station". EVs are going to be biggest single "new user" of electricity in decades and are going to be a huge drag on the network. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Grid_(Great_Britain)#/media/File:UK_historical_net_electricity_supplied.svg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Grid_(Great_Britain)#...