2 ms·

That's a pretty big conclusion you're drawing there, and it's not something that's been supported by much evidence. To be clear, the contention is "Most heavy

• credit_guy 4y ago
  > To be clear, the contention is "Most heavy industries go bankrupt because union members are constantly stealing supplies from the company." I didn't read it like that, and I'm surprised anyone can read it this way. It seems to me the contention is that someone who steals from a company does other things too that lower the overall productivity of the company. One bad apple and all that. The supporting evidence was that once those people were fired, the company starting performing well. At least that's how I understand the OP's argument.
• alfor 4y ago
  Ok my claim is that if you go into an established unionised company that is going down if you look carefully you will probably find shady things going on and that people from the union will be at the center of it most of the time. Those position of power attract psychopathy personality, people that want to profit from the work of other but have no skin in the game. A bit like politic. What you need to be good in those job is to be good at pretending to care of others while destroying people that get in your way.