4 ms·
> Tech-wise, would be interested to hear what this is using. Especially due to the claim on “30Gbps networking” considering there isn’t a Apple Silicon Mac wit
by jsjohnst 4y ago
> Tech-wise, would be interested to hear what this is using.
Especially due to the claim on “30Gbps networking” considering there isn’t a Apple Silicon Mac with over a single 10GbE port.
- bongobingo1 4y agoThey may mean host->container which can have performance limits, at least when running via slirp4netns in user mode due to all the frame copying (who knows if they meet both those requirements on macOS). Newer things like pasta avoid some overheads.
- danpalmer 4y agoMacs also don't typically have disks that fast, so unless it's transferring out of memory, which won't saturate 30Gbps for long, that also seems to not be that useful. Latency feels like it would be a better trade-off here, I wonder what they're doing to reduce host to container latency.
- jsjohnst 4y ago> I wonder what they're doing to reduce host to container latency Considering that any solution they came up with is almost assured to be using Apple’s virtualization frameworks, I’d venture the answer is near zero (at least for work they specifically did).