>... not sure why it's back in the news ... The paper [1] was just published, the first round in the news was due to the presentation of their findings, but no

>... not sure why it's back in the news ... The paper [1] was just published, the first round in the news was due to the presentation of their findings, but not the publishing of any papers (as near as I can tell). Thankfully it's an open-access article. [1] http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1115323109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1115323109