2 ms·
The key here is to have all the relevant dimensionless numbers (e.g. Reynolds number, perhaps Mach number, Froude number, etc.) as well as the geometry (which i
by HPsquared 4y ago
The key here is to have all the relevant dimensionless numbers (e.g. Reynolds number, perhaps Mach number, Froude number, etc.) as well as the geometry (which is also dimensionless: it's a set of angles and ratios), of your wind tunnel model consistent with the real-world situation you're testing. Then you measure other dimensionless quantities (e.g. drag coefficient).
The tests give a correlation from one dimensionless quantity to another.
That can mean, counter-intuitively, that a wind tunnel model needs to have a higher wind speed than the full-size object - so that the Reynolds number is correct.
- hgsgm 4y agoAngle is a dimension, and not equivalent to length. Fight me (and Matlab).
- HPsquared 4y agoAngle in radians is just (length of arc) / (radius). That is length/length, which cancel out - so angle is dimensionless. Solid angle is area/area.
- nh23423fefe 4y agoanother way: if exp(x) implies x dimensionless then by euler identity sin and cos parameters are dimensionless as well.