5 ms·
Which again is an opinion on the source and does not mention the content in any way. I must conclude that you're not interested in an object level discussion ab
by staunton 4y ago
Which again is an opinion on the source and does not mention the content in any way. I must conclude that you're not interested in an object level discussion about the topic at hand.
- pydry 4y agoI mean, how much would you expect people to try to constructively engage with the content of an RT article saying that the war is great for the Russian economy? You know the conclusion was manufactured in advance and why. It's the same here. In another comment I did try to engage with the content and it got buried harder than this one shrug
- user3939382 4y agoI'm not sure how to make this more clear, but "the content" is presented in bad faith. This is like writing an article about how plant life is thriving in a field because they were fertilized by the blood of hundreds of soldiers and you're saying, "Yeah, but what do you think about the plants growing better?"