> It's not the non-violent choice any more than England trying to appease Nazi Germany was the non-violent choice. Or France calling Nasser as literally the ne

> It's not the non-violent choice any more than England trying to appease Nazi Germany was the non-violent choice. Or France calling Nasser as literally the new Hitler when they had become upset about the Suez Canal (real title from the NYTimes: "Nasser Is Hitler Imitator, France's Premier Charges"). It doesn't work that way. [1] https://www.nytimes.com/1956/07/31/archives/nasser-is-hitler-imitator-frances-premier-charges-forced-workers.html https://www.nytimes.com/1956/07/31/archives/nasser-is-hitler...