4 ms·
Playing devil’s advocate: I guess the legal argument here could be that you wouldn’t be able to come after Logitech for making a keyboard used to publish lies.
by graypegg 4y ago
Playing devil’s advocate: I guess the legal argument here could be that you wouldn’t be able to come after Logitech for making a keyboard used to publish lies. If microsoft could manage to convince a court that you could only get defamatory content out of bing by asking it to defame someone, I could see how that argument could work.
- dogma1138 4y agoThe analogy would be of Logitech would’ve released a keyboard that types for you and that keyboard then decided to type incorrect and possibly liable statements and not only that but that keyboard also decided to publish it. For Microsoft to be liable all you need to prove is that when asking a question without any guiding prompts the output contains libel. And this is the problem because Microsoft isn’t just pointing you to incorrect or libel information but they actively creating and promoting it.