4 ms·
The idea that they _don't_ pay for it is wild, honestly. There's no FOSS equivalent in so many other industries - they pay for every part of their supply chain
by DanHulton 4y ago
The idea that they _don't_ pay for it is wild, honestly. There's no FOSS equivalent in so many other industries - they pay for every part of their supply chain and yet still somehow make a profit. You can't open a hotdog stand and use "FOSS hotdogs".
The whole point of the post is that the FOSS model doesn't work and that sucks. I don't know what the answer to that is, and neither does he, but the answer certainly isn't "oh well."
Also, I feel you should read or reread the article - he explicitly responds to your last two paragraphs in there. Babel specifically has said they're not interested in doing the work that core-js is doing, and there are clearly _not_ thousands of people willing to step in and fill the void of core-js. They've had many opportunities before, including when everyone hated him for asking for financial support and the web seemingly united against him, and when he was stuck in prison for months, not maintaining anything. And yet core-js is still there at the forefront, because of the passion and his willingness to put up with too much abuse.
- ricardobeat 4y agoBut who said the FOSS model doesn't work? It's been working for decades. Having a well-paid, full-time job as an OSS maintainer is what doesn't work - it's the equivalent of becoming a celebrity, not achievable for 99% regardless of effort.
- edude03 4y agoI mean it's clearly not working for this guy. But seriously, depends on your definition of "works". It works for large companies, doesn't seem to work for anyone else. It seems the only opensource that "works" is when large companies are nice enough to open source and maintain something that is accidentally useful to someone else (IE, never the crown jewels obviously) otherwise you mostly hear stories of harassment and burn out.