It's because they aren't contradictory positions. The people who are against copilot are people who specifically choose licenses designed to ridicule and disman

It's because they aren't contradictory positions. The people who are against copilot are people who specifically choose licenses designed to ridicule and dismantle copyright. The problem is with Microsoft, who vigorously enforces their own copyrights, not only taking advantage of these projects without following their licenses, but even enabling others to do the same thing as a service. If Microsoft and Github released all of their source code under a FOSS license and required all of the users of copilot to do the same, people wouldn't have a problem with it. If copyright were ended for art, music, and source code, there would be nothing wrong with copilot.