It's not, but it's aware that certain words are less likely to be used in the sentences attributed to an agent who is specifically not meant to be 'controversi

It's not, but it's aware that certain words are less likely to be used in the sentences attributed to an agent who is specifically not meant to be 'controversial'. I do wonder how much testing has been put into some of these prompts though. Given that the LLM is not 'being' the agent, it's guessing what words the agent's output should contain, wouldn't it make more sense to ascribe attributes like this directly to the agent, rather than say what the agent 'should' do? Like, "Sydney's responses are never vague, controversial or off-topic", rather than 'should avoid being'...?