There’s no comparison. Land already has a ton of riders attached to it, because ultimately a city, state, or nation is defined by the land they control. For ex

There’s no comparison. Land already has a ton of riders attached to it, because ultimately a city, state, or nation is defined by the land they control. For example, we would all be justifiably outraged if the government declared that SF buyers are only allowed to buy AMD graphics cards, while those living in Oakland are allowed only Nvidia, and the rest of the people in the area are not allowed graphics cards at all. And yet, while many like me dislike land zoning, which is basically equivalent to the graphics card example, no one is calling it a fundamentally illegal and unconstitutional practice.