> It should be forbidden to forbid. That sounds a bit extreme, do you feel that way in all things (murder, theft, slavery,...) or only in terms of limiting the

> It should be forbidden to forbid. That sounds a bit extreme, do you feel that way in all things (murder, theft, slavery,...) or only in terms of limiting the harm entities can cause through distribution of closed-source software? Personally I feel like forbidding things is fine. It won't prevent bad things from happening, but it can protect us humans from our own psychological weaknesses. I think of antitrust legislation as an example.