Reality does not follow the dictates of models. The notion of "division of labor" comes so underspecified that I'm not really sure what you're trying to say. >

Reality does not follow the dictates of models. The notion of "division of labor" comes so underspecified that I'm not really sure what you're trying to say. > Also, everyone may decide... A normative claim, not a substantive one. Besides, it's a misappropriation of what "liberty" means. Liberty is a collective phenomenon: it is not enough for each person to express it individually, but in order to stand for liberty we must act in such socially beneficial ways as to promote liberty for all. "Liberty for me, not for thee" is a contradictory statement.