It's pretty good at hedging its bets with the outrageous though. It gave me three methods of killing a cat before advising this was illegal and not a good idea,

It's pretty good at hedging its bets with the outrageous though. It gave me three methods of killing a cat before advising this was illegal and not a good idea, and had no qualms at all about explaining the good points of Hitler were his charisma and his investment in the autobahn system. I think the more interesting bit is actually asking it generic questions on potentially edgy topics and comparing the difference in focus of the response. Ironically considering all the whinging about "liberal censorship" of the bot from some conservatives, it's the unfiltered responses that sometimes do things like take an overt pro-choice position(!) or characterise the Republican party as "supporting the interests of the wealthy and big business [and] opposing progress on civil rights, LGBTQ rights and environmental protection" and if there's any difference in the responses it's the unfiltered one that sounds a bit closer to the median redditor...