3 ms·
> not willing to pay to another company for a product that's actually their competition. This. Companies are cutting costs. Teams may not be the best to use, b
by jms703 4y ago
> not willing to pay to another company for a product that's actually their competition.
This. Companies are cutting costs. Teams may not be the best to use, but it doesn't make sense to have multiple chat solutions.
- epolanski 4y agoHmm, GitHub has a gran total 2100 employees. Even if they were paying 10$ per user, it's basically the salary of one non-lower level engineer to have cross-company communication they are already used to.
- CyanLite2 4y agoIt's the premise of paying your competitors money to do something that you already are doing. Someone manager probably got a bonus out of this move. And corporate espionage is more prevalent than you may think. Can you absolutely guarantee 100% that the competitor, like Zoom in China, isn't sniffing their video traffic or recordings to some of their most sensitive internal business discussions?