4 ms·
It really isn't the same thing; Nagel raises the same point as your example in his famous essay on Bats [1]. Marcus' point is there is no reason to think ChatG
by mellosouls 4y ago
It really isn't the same thing; Nagel raises the same point as your example in his famous essay on Bats [1].
Marcus' point is there is no reason to think ChatGPT/similar has (or ever will have) sentience, not that it is simply a different type that we do not have access to.
[1]https://wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Is_It_Like_to_Be_a_Bat https://wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Is_It_Like_to_Be_a_Bat