4 ms·

> Yes, it's what thinkers do :) You're proving that thinking and knowing are wholly uncorrelated. > Not all Language Models need to be based on relational fre

> Yes, it's what thinkers do :) You're proving that thinking and knowing are wholly uncorrelated. > Not all Language Models need to be based on relational frequencies of term occurrence. "A language model is a probability distribution over sequences of words" If you don't even know what an LM is, I don't feel like reading the rest of this.

mdp2021 4y ago
> proving Whereas your contribution is? > know An interview with Yann LeCun came out yesterday: he defined (S)LMs along those lines. Maybe discuss the matter with him. Does YLC represent an authoritative part enough for you? > don't feel "Outstanding". Does not make much sense here