> "That means sometimes Chat is going to appear as if it were of the left" I'm pretty it is deeply biased in favor of the left: https://www.snopes.com/fact-ch

> "That means sometimes Chat is going to appear as if it were of the left" I'm pretty it is deeply biased in favor of the left: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/chatgpt-trump-admiring-poem/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/chatgpt-trump-admiring-poe... https://reason.com/2022/12/13/where-does-chatgpt-fall-on-the-political-compass/ https://reason.com/2022/12/13/where-does-chatgpt-fall-on-the... I mean, just ask about any political situation and it will just read you the mainstream narrative that one would hear in the New York Times and Washington Posts like, which is heavily left-leaning. It essentially suffers from the same bias problem that wikipedia, for instance, suffers. Ultimately, this obviously has nothing to do with the software itself, but rather with that information they fed to it and the political bias of researches and – ESPECIALLY - investors themselves, which are the ones who ultimately choose how the model gets fine-tuned. All in all, technology evolves an I'm sure this technology one day will become accessible and cheap enough for it to run on consumer hardware, which will allow people to create models which aren't as heavyly biased, politically speaking, as ChatGPT is.