This conversation would have great benefit if you actually went to read the text of the AGPL license. By default you are entitled to run only code that you wro

This conversation would have great benefit if you actually went to read the text of the AGPL license. By default you are entitled to run only code that you wrote yourself. You need the copyright holders of anything else to grant you the right to run their code. Microsoft usually grants the right behind payment. AGPL authors grant you the right on the condition that you share your changes (if you do any changes) with your users. If you choose to disobey the terms, two things can happen: 1. Nobody notices and nothing happens. 2. You can be taken to court. > but it should not be considered a free license Why not? Which of the 4 freedoms is it taking away?