3 ms·
> "Matrix 2.0" is not a breaking change Was there really no better name for the talk?
by UltimateEdge 4y ago
> "Matrix 2.0" is not a breaking change
Was there really no better name for the talk?
- abnercoimbre 4y agoI must acknowledge I was very spooked by the 2.0 in there
- justeleblanc 4y agoSemver does not apply to everything, and definitely not to end products aimed at consumers.
- palata 4y agoExcept that Matrix is a protocol, and the end products using it may like to know that v2.0 (which says "I'm breaking backward compatibility") is actually not breaking backward compatibility.