4 ms·
Judges handle stuff like this a lot, where people cobble together clauses to create a franken-contracts, and wind up with a lot of self contradictions. In gener
by chomp 4y ago
Judges handle stuff like this a lot, where people cobble together clauses to create a franken-contracts, and wind up with a lot of self contradictions. In general, specific clauses should win out over general clauses, so this in theory might hold up depending on the judge, but it's not advisable to use this in any real life setting. Also using the name MIT is how you end up with some of the complaints in the Neo4j lawsuit, and is also not advisable. OP should seek legal counsel.
- Arrath 4y ago> where people cobble together clauses to create a franken-contracts A blight in any number of industries. I'm most intimately familiar with construction. My go-to example is a project where the contract specifications from the Owner required, in one paragraph buried deeply within, that a certain critical person have a license for their craft. Not a problem, that's how it usually goes and why the state issues licenses, after all. The problem was that the project was in Alaska, and the specifications explicitly listed out a license in Virginia.