3 ms·
I don't know about agony, but your ability to pay for it depends on having an underclass whose time is significantly less valuable than your own. You're talking
by edflsafoiewq 4y ago
I don't know about agony, but your ability to pay for it depends on having an underclass whose time is significantly less valuable than your own. You're talking about having servants (servants as a gig of course).
- anonyfox 4y agoThat’s not how division of labor works actually. Also, everyone may decide what to spend their money on, be it on vacations, hobbies, goods or … having stuff delivered.
- uoaei 4y agoReality does not follow the dictates of models. The notion of "division of labor" comes so underspecified that I'm not really sure what you're trying to say. > Also, everyone may decide... A normative claim, not a substantive one. Besides, it's a misappropriation of what "liberty" means. Liberty is a collective phenomenon: it is not enough for each person to express it individually, but in order to stand for liberty we must act in such socially beneficial ways as to promote liberty for all. "Liberty for me, not for thee" is a contradictory statement.
- tomjen3 4y agoThat's hardly an issue if you think about it: my time, as a student, was significantly less valuable than my current time as a senior software engineer. I can't hire myself in the past, but there are other people who are in other places in their lives than I am.