I suppose I'm indifferent to whether it's hard or not; it doesn't matter to me as a consumer. If your LLM can't provide the sources for the facts it's asserting

I suppose I'm indifferent to whether it's hard or not; it doesn't matter to me as a consumer. If your LLM can't provide the sources for the facts it's asserting, then maybe we shouldn't trust it in matters that depend on facts? If your LLM can't tell the difference between factual statements, postulation, and argument, then why would I trust for anything at all? It's a great party trick though. FWIW, I prompted ChatGPT with "Describe how tail recursion works in programming, and why it is important. Include citations." and it actually included two relevant links in its sources, but did not indicates which part of the text depended on them.